There's a current discussion going on over at the HoBD (House of Bishops/Deputies) list. It's ostensibly about finances, stewardship, structure, evangelism and growth. I have some random thoughts about the whole shebang.
• Any realization of a streamlined structure
with fewer layers of hierarchy and fewer representatives (in all orders) at any
council's table will require fundamental shifts in stewardship attitudes. The
fact is that many people in the church give financial gifts for the work of the
church with mental strings attached, which may often be unconscious. In the
back of their heads they think they have a corresponding right to voice and
vote about how those financial gifts are used. Gift giving of this variety is
better known as dues paying in a membership-club setting. I see an inverse
relationship between loss of control over common elements of our lives, such as
choice over jobs and housing due to macroeconomic factors, and the amount of
control we desire to exercise over optional parts of our lives, such as how we
choose to do church.
• Trusting the leadership to do what they've
been elected or hired to do is okay with most people until the leadership does
something with which they disagree. Then the big guns of disparagement
of the intentions and thinking ability of those leaders and sniping criticism
in the blogosphere come out blazing -- loud, fast and furious. Further
blame and ridicule are heaped onto the leaders when they exercise judicious
silence rather than reacting with anxiety over such public attacks. The
political culture in this country has taught us to expect in other arenas the
public relations managed responses that come from our politicos when they are
attacked to be the appropriate response.
• Process takes time, but time has become
foreshortened in today's cyber culture where people expect instantaneous
responses to complex, multifaceted, multilayered, multipart issues. Part
of the complexity is the sheer numbers of constituents involved in any single
issue, while the actual number of stakeholders may be somewhat smaller. I use
"stakeholder" to refer to those who have a direct stake in the
outcomes and "constituent" to mean anyone who has an interest
in the outcomes, such as an overarching justice interest although not
necessarily a direct, personally life-changing interest, or an observer's
interest, such as that derived from being a regular reader of the posts.
• When a large number of comments are floated
in cyberspace on any subject, their sheer volume overwhelms our perception of
how little time has actually elapsed from the raising of the issue to
subsequent action on it. There seems to be a direct correlation between
the rapidity of the cyberspace posts and impatience for responses from those
leaders to whom the work on the issue(s) has been assigned by virtue of their
positions. I liken this to the single most prevalent reason for failures in
cooking: impatience causes the cook to lift the lid, open the oven door or turn
off the heat too soon. Similarly, when one is lost looking for an address,
chances are good that you haven't gone far enough, and staying the course for a
while longer will get you to your destination.
• We have difficulty distinguishing between
people and positions, and consequently, we have difficulty respecting the
authority of positions when we are judgmental about the people who occupy those
positions. In recent years civics education has been eroded and we
have been bombarded by 15, 30, 45 and 60-second ads that encourage us to make
snap judgments about everything from underarm deodorant to who should be
elected to our highest offices. We no longer practice, much less have the
training, to analyze and think logically, and our culture, the one in which we
are immersed and live, promotes images as a handy substitute for the more
prosaic and mundane tasks of engaging what we encounter and how we live. I have
often asked in the last several years, where can people go to participate in
forums to have conversations about difficult topics in a disciplined,
reflective, loving manner? If we, the church, don't step up to provide these
forums, because we fear controversy, then who will?
This list of random thoughts is just that: random. I hope to
gather more random thoughts on these topics to post here in the days to come.
Thank you for reading. I hope you'll join the conversation.